<b>HRAC Group 2</b> <font size='2'> (Legacy B) </font> resistant Hordeum murinum ssp. glaucum from Australia, Western Australia

International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds

LOGIN | REGISTER
Friday, November 1, 2024

HRAC GROUP 2 (LEGACY B) RESISTANT SMOOTH BARLEY
(Hordeum murinum ssp. glaucum)

Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)

Australia, Western Australia

INTRODUCTION		SMOOTH BARLEY
Smooth Barley (Hordeum murinum ssp. glaucum) is a monocot weed in the Poaceae family. In Western Australia this weed first evolved resistance to Group 2 (Legacy B) herbicides in 2005 and infests Wheat. Group 2 (Legacy B) herbicides are known as Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase (Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ). Research has shown that these particular biotypes are resistant to sulfometuron-methyl, and sulfosulfuron and they may be cross-resistant to other Group 2 (Legacy B) herbicides. The 'Group' letters/numbers that you see throughout this web site refer to the classification of herbicides by their site of action. To see a full list of herbicides and HRAC herbicide classifications click here.

QUIK STATS (last updated Aug 10, 2005 )
Common Name	Smooth Barley
Species	Hordeum murinum ssp. glaucum
Group	Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)
Herbicides	sulfometuron-methyl, and sulfosulfuron
Location	Australia, Western Australia
Year	2005
Situation(s)	Wheat
Contributors - (Alphabetically)	Peter Boutsalis, and Christopher Preston
Edit this Case \| Add New Case of Resistance \| Add Note

ACADEMIC ASPECTS

Confirmation Tests

Field, and Greenhouse trials comparing a known susceptible Smooth Barley biotype with this Smooth Barley biotype have been used to confirm resistance. For further information on the tests conducted please contact the local weed scientists that provided this information.

Genetics

Genetic studies on HRAC Group 2 resistant Smooth Barley have not been reported to the site. There may be a note below or an article discussing the genetics of this biotype in the Fact Sheets and Other Literature

Mechanism of Resistance

The mechanism of resistance for this biotype is either unknown or has not been entered in the database. If you know anything about the mechanism of resistance for this biotype then please update the database.

Relative Fitness

There is no record of differences in fitness or competitiveness of these resistant biotypes when compared to that of normal susceptible biotypes. If you have any information pertaining to the fitness of Group 2 (Legacy B) resistant Smooth Barley from Western Australia please update the database.

Edit Case | Add Note | Add Article | Add New Case | Help

CONTRIBUTING WEED SCIENTISTS

PETER BOUTSALIS

Postdoctural Fellow/ Consultant University Of Adelaide / Plant Science Consulting Plant And Pest Science 800 N Lindbergh Blvd 02G Adelaide, 5064, South Australia Australia Email Peter Boutsalis

CHRISTOPHER PRESTON

Postdoctural Fellow/ Consultant University Of Adelaide - Waite Campus Crc For Australian Weed Management And School Of Agriculture Box 2146 Adelaide, 5064, South Australia Australia Email Christopher Preston

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Herbicide Resistance Action Committee, The Weed Science Society of America, and weed scientists in Western Australia have been instrumental in providing you this information. Particular thanks is given to Peter Boutsalis, and Christopher Preston for providing detailed information.

Drag a column header and drop it here to group by that column

Herbicide Resistant Smooth Barley Globally
(Hordeum murinum ssp. glaucum)

Country

FirstYear

Situation

Active Ingredients

Site of Action

Australia (Victoria)

1984

Alfalfa, and Cereals

diquat, and paraquat

PS I Electron Diversion ( HRAC Group 22 (Legacy D)

Australia (South Australia)

1990

Alfalfa, and Cereals

diquat, and paraquat

PS I Electron Diversion ( HRAC Group 22 (Legacy D)

Australia (South Australia)

2000

Pastures, and Winter pulses

fluazifop-butyl, and quizalofop-ethyl

Inhibition of Acetyl CoA Carboxylase ( HRAC Group 1 (Legacy A)

Australia (Western Australia)

2005

Wheat

sulfometuron-methyl, and sulfosulfuron

Inhibition of Acetolactate Synthase ( HRAC Group 2 (Legacy B)

Australia (South Australia)

2016

Around Buildings

glyphosate

Inhibition of Enolpyruvyl Shikimate Phosphate Synthase ( HRAC Group 9 (Legacy G)

Literature about Similar Cases

1 2

Page size:

select

Page: of 2

Items 1 to 5 of 9

Matthews, N. ; Powles, S. B. ; Preston, C.. 2000. Mechanisms of resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase-inhibiting herbicides in a Hordeum leporinum population. Pest Management Science 56 : 441 - 447.

A failure of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase)-inhibiting herbicides to control a population of Hordeum leporinum Link [H. murinum subsp. leporinum] (barleygrass) occurred in South Australia following eight applications of these herbicides in both crops and pastures. This population was 7.6-fold resistant to fluazifop-P compared with standard susceptible populations. The population was between 3.6- and 3.8-fold resistant to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides, except butroxydim to which it was susceptible. ACCase extracted from resistant plants and assayed in the presence of herbicides in vitro was susceptible to fluazifop acid and other aryloxyphenoxypropanoate herbicides, but was 4-fold less sensitive to sethoxydim compared with ACCase from susceptible plants. Resistant plants metabolized fluazifop acid about 1.3-fold more rapidly compared with susceptible plants; however, sethoxydim was metabolised equally in both populations. Resistance to fluazifop-P and other aryloxyphenoxypropanoate herbicides may be the result of increased herbicide detoxification, whereas resistance to sethoxydim appears to be due to a modified target enzyme. Herbicide resistance in this population is unusual in that different mechanisms appear to confer resistance to the aryloxyphenoxypropanoate and cyclohexanedione herbicides..

Purba, E. ; Preston, C. ; Powles, S. B.. 1996. Growth and competitiveness of paraquat-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Hordeum leporinum. Weed Research (Oxford) 36 : 311 - 317.

Growth, competitiveness and seed characteristics were compared in paraquat-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Hordeum [murinum subsp.] leporinum collected from neighbouring fields near Ouse, Tasmania. In field experiments at Adelaide in 1991, dry weight and tiller production were greater in the susceptible biotype as compared with the resistant biotype in the absence of competition, however, the reproductive output was the same. Competitiveness in the field was estimated using a replacement series design that showed only slight differences between the two biotypes. There were no differences in seed weight, number of seeds per head, seed viability or seedling establishment between the two biotypes. When grown in pots in monoculture, the production of tillers was the same throughout the growing season, but inflorescences appeared on the resistant biotype earlier and matured earlier than did those of the susceptible biotype. It is concluded that under field conditions the resistant biotype did not show a reduction in fitness as compared with the susceptible biotype..

Purba, E. ; Preston, C. ; Powles, S. B.. 1995. The mechanism of resistance to paraquat is strongly temperature dependent in resistant Hordeum leporinum Link and H. glaucum Steud. Planta 196 : 464 - 468.

Paraquat-resistant biotypes of the closely-related weed species Hordeum leporinum [H. murinum subsp. leporinum] and H. glaucum are highly resistant to paraquat when grown during the normal winter growing season. However, when grown and treated with paraquat in summer these biotypes are markedly less resistant to paraquat. This reduced resistance to paraquat in summer is primarily a result of increased temperature following herbicide treatment. The mechanism governing this decrease in resistance at high temperature was examined in H. murinum subsp. leporinum. No differences were observed between susceptible and resistant biotypes in the interaction of paraquat with isolated thylakoids when assayed at 15, 25 or 35°C. About 98 and 65% of applied paraquat was absorbed through the leaf cuticle of both biotypes at 15 and 30°C, respectively. Following application to leaves, more herbicide was translocated in a basipetal direction in the susceptible biotype compared to the resistant biotype at 15°C. However, at 30°C more paraquat was translocated in a basipetal direction in the resistant biotype. Photosynthetic activity of young leaf tissue from within the leaf sheath which had not been directly exposed to paraquat was measured 24 h after treatment of plants with paraquat. This activity was inhibited in the susceptible biotype when plants were maintained at either 15 or 30°C after treatment. In contrast, photosynthetic activity of such tissue of the resistant biotype was not inhibited when plants were maintained at 15°C after treatment, but was inhibited at 30°C. The mechanism of resistance in the biotype of H. leporinum correlates with decreased translocation of paraquat and decreased penetration to the active site. This mechanism is temperature-sensitive and breaks down at higher temperatures..

Purba, E. ; Preston, C. ; Powles, S. B.. 1993. Paraquat resistance in a biotype of Vulpia bromoides (L.) S. F. Gray. Weed Research (Oxford) 33 : 409 - 413.

Laboratory experiments were conducted to study a biotype of V. bromoides which had survived field applications of 125 g/ha paraquat and 75 g diquat in a lucerne field at Elmhurst, Victoria. Pot-grown resistant and a susceptible biotypes of V. bromoides were sprayed with paraquat at concn of 12.5-800 g and diquat at 25-800 g. Applications of paraquat at 50 g killed all of the susceptible V. bromoides plants but only 6% of the resistant biotype. The LD₅₀ for paraquat of the resistant biotype was 5- to 6-fold higher than for the susceptible biotype. The resistant biotype was also resistant to diquat, but was susceptible to glyphosate at 720 g and metribuzin at 300 g. Application of 100 g paraquat at anthesis completely suppressed seed set of the susceptible biotype and reduced that of the resistant biotype by 95%. Seed set by the paraquat-treated resistant biotype, however, showed little reduction. This is the 4th species to have been found to be resistant to bipyridyl herbicides in this field; the other herbicide resistant weeds are Hordeum glaucum, H. leporinum [Hordeum murinum subsp. leporinum] and Arctotheca calendula..

Davis, R. C.. 1992. Agrichemical industry initiatives to combat development of herbicide resistance. : 144 - 147.

Currently 6 species of 4 weeds in Australia are resistant to herbicides. They are Hordeum glaucum, H. leporinum [Hordeum murinum, subsp. leporinum] Arctotheca calendula, Lolium rigidum, Avena fatua and A. sterilis. Resistance in L. rigidum is rapidly spreading and is a serious threat to viable winter cropping. Many, but not all, selections of L. rigidum exhibit cross and multiple resistances. A. fatua and A. sterilis resistance is likely to spread rapidly and become a serious problem if farmers don't quickly adopt measures to check its development. The Australian agricultural chemical industry has formed, under the auspices of the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Association, a Herbicides Resistance Action Committee to assist farmers to combat the threat of resistance. The committee formulates and promotes the industry's strategies to minimise the risk and delay the development of resistance. The committee's current emphasis is focused on strategies to combat L. rigidum, A. fatua and A. sterilis..

1 2

Page size:

select

Page: of 2

Items 1 to 5 of 9

PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FIRST if you intend to base a significant portion of a scientific paper on data derived from this site.
Cite this site as: Heap, I. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet. Friday, November 1, 2024 . Available www.weedscience.org
Copyright © 1993- 2024 WeedScience.org All rights reserved. Fair use of this material is encouraged. Proper citation is requested.